Midday Breakaway: Meeting Expectations | NoVa Caps

by HomeDecorBeauty

Last week we reviewed the advanced statistic “expected goals for”. It’s a metric that analysts will use quite a bit this season, so we thought it might be beneficial to provide a bit of an introduction to the stat for those not familiar. If you are still a little fuzzy about the stat, or need a refresher, here’s a quick recap.

Expected goals for is a statistic based on the aggregation of each exact shot attempt location and type of shot, and the historical success rates for those shots/types taken at each location.

For example, if Alex Ovechkin takes a shot from the top of the right circle, and historical data for that exact location says 5% of the shots have been goals, Ovechkin would be credited with a 0.05 expected goals for (xGF) value for that one shot attempt. The xGF values ​​are summed over the course of a game or other time segment, yielding a resultant “expected goals for” (xGF) value. If Ovechkin made five shot attempts in a game with an aggregate expected goals for of 2.35, he earned an xGF of 2.35.

The same is calculated for the opposition while Ovechkin is on the ice. If an opposing player takes a shot that has a 3% historical value of scoring, while Ovechkin is on the ice, the opposing player is credited with the historical value of 0.03 xGF and Ovechkin is credited with an expected goal against (xGA) of 0.03 .

We can sum the player’s expected goals for and expected goals against to achieve an overall expected goals differential, which would be 0.05 – 0.03 = +0.02. Anything in the positive conveys that the player is generating more scoring opportunities than the opposition when the player is on the ice.

2022-23 Preseason Values

Here is a look at the Capitals players and their expected goals differential (xGF – xGA) for the 2022-23 preseason, so far. [Click to enlarge].

FFEF602D 7B87 446E 89BB 7690E24E2D5D

There are no real surprises at the top of the list (the best differential). Lucas Johansen has the best differential among all prospects in camp that have played in a game. In other words, the Capitals are generating more shot attempts/better quality of scoring chances than the opposition when he is on the ice. Joe Snively and Hendrix Lapierre are a close second and third among prospects.

At the low end, Dylan McIlrath is really no surprise, as his brand of defense is a stay-at-home style. Connor McMichael has the lowest differential among all prospect forwards.


As with ALL statistics, the expected goals differential metric is a single brush stroke to an overall painting. It provides part of the overall picture, but in no way should it be used alone to render an overall verdict or opinion on a player.

The current expected goals differentials presented above include a number of significant variables. Players have played a different number of games, with varying linemates or varying expertise, against a wide range of opposing expertise.

By Jon Sorensen


About Jon Sorensen

Jon has been a Caps fan since day one, attending his first game at the Capital Center in 1974. His interest in the Caps has grown over the decades and included time as a season ticket holder. He has been a journalist covering the team for 10+ years, primarily focusing on analysis, analytics and prospect development.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

About Us

We are a team of home decor and beauty enthusiasts who want to help you make your home beautiful and your life easier. We believe that every home should be a reflection of the people who live in it, and we are passionate about helping our readers create a space they love.  We believe that beauty comes from within, and we want to help our readers find their own unique sense of style.



Email: [email protected]


Decor & Design

Editors' Picks


Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

@2022 – All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by HomeDecorBeauty